Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, Medical Science and Practice
Case Report, Microbiology and Immunology
Case Report, Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences
Commentaries, Neurosciences and Behavioural Sciences
Commentaries, Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care
Drug Evaluation and Clinical Trials, Original Research Article
Editorial
Epidemiology and Public Health, Original Research Article
Ethnomedicine and Phytomedicines, Original Research Article
Ethnomedicine and Phytomedicines, Review Article
Medical Science and Practice, Case Report
Medical Science and Practice, Original Research Article
Minireview Pharmacology and Toxicology
Minireview, Pharmacy Profession and Advocacy
Miniview, Pharmaceutical Education
Original Research Article, Drug Evaluation and Clinical Trials
Original Research Article, Drug Research and Development
Original Research Article, Epidemiology and Public Health
Original Research Article, Ethnomedicine and Phytomedicines
Original Research Article, Microbiology and Immunology
Original Research Article, Neurology
Original Research Article, Pharmaceutical Education
Original Research Article, Pharmaceutical Technology and Manufacturing
Original Research Article, Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery
Original Research Article, Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care
Original Research Article, Pharmacy Practice
Pharmaceutical Technology and Manufacturing, Original Research Article
Pharmacology and Toxicology, Original Research Article
Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care, Case Report
Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care, Original Research Article
Pharmacy Practice, Original Research Article
Pharmacy Profession and Advocacy, Original Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Medical Devices
Review Article, Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences
Review Article, Perspective
Review Article, Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care
Review Article, Pharmacy Practice
Review, Epidemiology and Public Health
Systematic Review, Drug Evaluation and Clinical Trials
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, Medical Science and Practice
Case Report, Microbiology and Immunology
Case Report, Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences
Commentaries, Neurosciences and Behavioural Sciences
Commentaries, Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care
Drug Evaluation and Clinical Trials, Original Research Article
Editorial
Epidemiology and Public Health, Original Research Article
Ethnomedicine and Phytomedicines, Original Research Article
Ethnomedicine and Phytomedicines, Review Article
Medical Science and Practice, Case Report
Medical Science and Practice, Original Research Article
Minireview Pharmacology and Toxicology
Minireview, Pharmacy Profession and Advocacy
Miniview, Pharmaceutical Education
Original Research Article, Drug Evaluation and Clinical Trials
Original Research Article, Drug Research and Development
Original Research Article, Epidemiology and Public Health
Original Research Article, Ethnomedicine and Phytomedicines
Original Research Article, Microbiology and Immunology
Original Research Article, Neurology
Original Research Article, Pharmaceutical Education
Original Research Article, Pharmaceutical Technology and Manufacturing
Original Research Article, Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery
Original Research Article, Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care
Original Research Article, Pharmacy Practice
Pharmaceutical Technology and Manufacturing, Original Research Article
Pharmacology and Toxicology, Original Research Article
Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care, Case Report
Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care, Original Research Article
Pharmacy Practice, Original Research Article
Pharmacy Profession and Advocacy, Original Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Medical Devices
Review Article, Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences
Review Article, Perspective
Review Article, Pharmacotherapy/Pharmaceutical Care
Review Article, Pharmacy Practice
Review, Epidemiology and Public Health
Systematic Review, Drug Evaluation and Clinical Trials
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Research Article
Epidemiology and Public Health
2025
:4;
11
doi:
10.25259/AJPPS_2025_011

A cross-sectional study of undergraduate pharmacy students’ awareness and knowledge of mycetoma

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, West African Postgraduate College of Pharmacists, Abuja, Nigeria.

*Corresponding author: Chinelo Nneka Ikeanyi, Masters of Pharmacy Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria. chinelo.ikeanyi@unn.edu.ng

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Ikeanyi CN, Onuigwe NP, Kuchazi BM, et al. A cross-sectional study of undergraduate pharmacy students’ awareness and knowledge of mycetoma. Am J Pharmacother Pharm Sci. 2025:011.

Abstract

Objectives:

Mycetoma is a disease of socioeconomic significance that mostly impact people in environments with low resources and could result in lifelong harm and incapacity. The study assessed pharmacy students’ awareness and knowledge of mycetoma disease, as well as their preparedness to learn the requisite knowledge and skills for its prevention and control.

Materials and Methods:

Using a convenience sample technique and a two-sectioned structured questionnaire, a cross-sectional study was carried out on undergraduate pharmacy students. The data were summarized using frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. At p < 0.05 level of significance, the Chi-square was utilized to ascertain correlations between the independent variables and the socio-demographic characteristics of the students.

Results:

The response rate was 68%, with only 406 out of 600 questionnaires being correctly completed. Half of the respondents (n = 203.50%) were males and in the Bachelor of Pharmacy program (51.5%), while 201 (49.5%) were within the age range of 18 and 29 years. Even though only 25.06% had attended lectures on mycetoma, more than half (58.48%) were aware of it, and 260 (64.0%) had good knowledge. Students’ knowledge of mycetoma was influenced by their academic year (p = 0.004).

Conclusion:

Pharmacy students are aware and possess good knowledge of mycetoma disease, though they require advanced knowledge. Policymakers and education regulatory organizations should incorporate studies on mycetoma identification, diagnosis, management, prevention, and control strategies in the undergraduate pharmacy program curriculum.

Keywords

Awareness
Knowledge
Mycetoma
Pharmacy students

INTRODUCTION

Mycetoma is a neglected tropical disease of global concern. It is a disease of socioeconomically important that could lead to permanent disability of infected persons if not treated early.[1] It affects mostly individuals in limited resource settings, such as Nigeria.[2] It is characterized by large subcutaneous lesions that are often stigmatizing. Despite being curable and preventable, especially in the early stages, it has a high mortality rate and a significant socioeconomic impact.[3] It is a subcutaneous granulomatous infectious disease[4,5] that affects the skin.[6]

Mycetoma is a chronic pus-forming infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissues that affects the lower limbs in more than 80% of cases.[7] The disease most likely initiates after a minor trauma that inoculates the causative microorganism in the subcutaneous tissue.[3] Mycetoma organisms possess mechanisms that aid survival in the human host, allowing them to evade immune defenses.[8,9] Pain is usually not present, but the temperature at the site may rise.

People who are at risk of mycetoma disease include agricultural workers,[3] and individuals who walk barefoot in dry dusty conditions.[10,11] Farmers and other people living in rural areas are more commonly affected since the pathogens causing mycetoma are present in soil and water.[12,13] Males are more frequently affected (sex ratio 3–4:1), with an age ranging between 20 and 40 years.[10] However, a study has confirmed that females are equally at risk of having mycetoma, just as males.[14,15] Prevention of mycetoma can be achieved by wearing shoes.

Mycetoma is diagnosed based on clinical presentation and identification of the causative organism, which can be detected by directly examining the grains that are discharged by the sinuses.[13] The samples can be obtained by fine-needle aspiration or surgical biopsy.[16] Treatment of mycetoma includes antibiotics or antifungal medicine, depending on whether the disease is caused by bacteria or fungi. Surgery is sometimes needed to cut away the infected tissue.

Mycetoma disease is endemic in Nigeria primarily because the majority of patients seek medical care very late, when there is already bone involvement, resulting in amputations. Poor access to health care and substantial financial costs were barriers to seeking treatment for mycetoma.[17] Early case detection of mycetoma depends on appropriate public health messaging and community education.[17] Unfortunately, most healthcare professionals, including community pharmacists, do not have adequate knowledge and skills required for effective management and control of mycetoma.[18,19] This results in suboptimal pharmacists’ involvement in the design and implementation of effective prevention strategies for mycetoma disease.[20-22]

This study investigated the pharmacy students’ awareness and knowledge of mycetoma. Findings from this study will buttress the need for incorporating studies of mycetoma into the pharmacy curriculum, since it is believed that short courses and training, research, and advocacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

This is a cross-sectional study conducted among pharmacy students of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), utilizing a structured questionnaire with a convenient sampling method.

Study setting

The study was conducted in the faculty of pharmaceutical sciences of the UNN. The Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences comprises seven departments. The Bachelor of Pharmacy (B. Pharm) and Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm. D) programs are concurrently ongoing in the faculty presently as an undergraduate training program; the first Pharm. D students are in their 4th year of study at the time of this study. The students offer both theory and practical courses from all the departments. Each study year comprises about two hundred students, except for 1st-year students.

The federal university (UNN) is situated in Nsukka (a suburban community) and Enugu town, both in Enugu state. The majority of the residents of Nsukka are civil servants (mostly employed in the university), traders, while the rest are farmers.

Study instrument

A structured questionnaire comprising two sections: Section A and B; was used for this study. It was developed and examined for face and content validity by three experts: Two clinical pharmacists and one public health pharmacist. Respondents’ demographic data and mycetoma awareness were gathered in Section A. The respondents’ understanding of mycetoma was evaluated in Section B. Respondents were required to select “True” or “False” for each item question in this section. While incorrect answers received a score of “0,” correct answers were scored “1.” Using the mean as a cutoff point, the responses were divided into two categories: “Good knowledge” and “Poor knowledge.” The responses were presented as percentages.

A pilot study was conducted on 50 students from the faculty of agricultural science who were not part of the study population to ensure that the questionnaire was easily understood and to obtain the desired data. A reliability study was conducted using Cronbach’s alpha, and a reliability coefficient of 0.83 was obtained.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Every pharmacy student in their 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th year who gave consent to participate in the study was included in the study. Students who are not pharmacy students and those who did not consent to participate in the study were excluded.

Data collection

The questionnaire was distributed to Pharmacy students at the UNN, each in their 2nd year, 3rd year, 4th year, and 5th year. The questionnaires were given out to the students while they were seated in their lecture theaters immediately after lectures, and they were given about 10 minutes to respond to the questionnaires, after which the questionnaire was retrieved from them and filled. Every pharmacy student in the lecture theater who gave consent to participate in the study was given the questionnaire to fill out so as to have a good representation of the entire student body in the lecture theater. However, 600 questionnaires were given out to make up for the questionnaires that may not be properly filled.

Data analysis

The collected data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for data cleaning, after which it was exported into the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software for inferential and descriptive analysis. The data were summarized using frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation. Chi-square was used to determine associations between the independent variables and the students’ demographic characteristics.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UNN, with the reference number FPSRA/UNN/23/0068.

RESULTS

Out of the 600 questionnaires that were given out, only 406 were properly filled out, giving a response rate of 68%. Half 203 (50%) of the respondents were male, the majority (201; 49.5%) were between the ages of 18 and 29, while 209 (51.5%) were in B. Pharm program. See details in Table 1.

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (n=406).
Variable Frequency Percentage
Gender
  Male 203 50
  Female 203 50
Age
  18–23 201 49.5
  24–29 166 40.9
  30–34 36 8.7
  ≥35 3 0.7
Year of study
  2nd year 102 25.1
  3rd year 101 24.9
  4th year 101 24.9
  5th year 102 25.1
Degree
  B. Pharm 209 51.5
  Pharm. D 197 48.5

More than half (58.48%) of the respondents were aware of mycetoma disease, although only a few (25.06%) had received lectures or training on mycetoma disease. However, the majority (328; 80.59%) will want the study of mycetoma disease to be included in their undergraduate program curriculum.

A majority (336; 82.8%) of the respondents knew that mycetoma is both a fungal and bacterial infection that is contracted from the soil through a cut on the feet or skin, 266 (65.5%), and animal dung, 299 (73.6%). Most (247; 60.8%) knew that it cannot be contracted through sexual intercourse, while 301 (74.1%) knew that it can be spread from one part of the body to another and can lead to disability, 261 (64.3%). Details are as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Respondents’ knowledge of mycetoma (n=408).
Questions n(%) n(%)
True False
It is a disease caused by both fungi and bacteria 307 (75.6) 99 (24.4)
It is contracted from the soil through a cut on the feet or skin 266 (65.5) 140 (34.5)
It can be contacted from animal dung 299 (73.6) 107 (26.4)
It can spread from one part of the body to another 301 (74.1) 105 (25.9)
It affects both adults and children 275 (67.7) 131 (32.3)
It can lead to disability 261 (64.3) 145 (35.7)
It is usually painless at the initial stage of the disease 274 (67.5) 132 (32.5)
It cannot be transmitted from one person to another 203 (50.0) 203 (50.0)
It is not a sexually transmitted disease 247 (60.8) 159 (39.2)
It can be prevented by wearing protective covering on the feet 276 (68.0) 130 (32.0)

The mean knowledge score of trachoma was 33.3621 ± 17.12. More than half, 260 (64.0%) of the respondents had good knowledge of mycetoma, while 146 (36.0%) had poor knowledge of mycetoma [Figure 1].

Respondent’s knowledge of Mycetoma
Figure 1:
Respondent’s knowledge of Mycetoma

Table 3 revealed that the male students and students within the age range of 18–23 had more knowledge of mycetoma compared to their counterparts, though the difference in the knowledge was not statistically significant (p = 0.255 and 0.085, respectively). However, a significant difference in knowledge of mycetoma was observed among students in various years of study. Respondents who were in their 3rd and 5th study year had more knowledge of mycetoma when compared to their counterparts (p = 0.004).

Table 3: Association between students’ demographic characteristics and knowledge of mycetoma.
Variables Poor knowledge Good knowledge CHI-value df p-value
Gender
  Male 67 136 1.540 1 0.255
  Female 79 124
Age
  18–23 74 127
  24–29 65 101 6.628 3 0.085
  30–34 6 30
  ≥35 1 2
Year of study
  2nd 42 60
  3rd 26 75 13.549 3 0.004
  4th 48 53
  5th 30 72

df: Degree of freedom. Level of significance: p<0.05. CHI value: Pearson’s correlation value

DISCUSSION

This study revealed that pharmacy students are aware of mycetoma disease and have good knowledge of mycetoma. This could be due to the awareness programs and campaigns of mycetoma by Non Government Organisations (NGOs) and government agencies. This study agreed with a previous study, which stated that the awareness of some neglected tropical diseases is high due to numerous awareness programs and campaigns.[23]

The pharmacy students in this study confirmed that they had not obtained any lecture or information on the awareness of mycetoma from their lectures in school. Contrary to the findings of this study, a study conducted in five Asian countries stated that the medical students and non-medical students learned about neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) from their undergraduate study curriculum, buttressing the need for incorporating studies of NTDs into the undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. It is believed that short courses and training, research, advocacy, and sufficient funding are needed to reduce the burden of NTDs.[17]

The pharmacy students’ year of study was associated with their knowledge of mycetoma disease. The pharmacy students who had spent a longer time in the undergraduate program had more knowledge of mycetoma. This could be attributed to their experience and training in the course of the program, and also their participation in campaigns, symposiums, and organizations such as International Society for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Research (ISPOR). These ideas are informed by principles such as curriculum integration, active learning, self-regulated learning, and constructivist progression over time.[24,25]

Studies in low and middle income countries (LMICs) highlight the need to incorporate NTDs into medical education and professional training, with a particular focus on the most prevalent NTDs like mycetoma. Strengthening knowledge in this area will enhance the active participation of key stakeholders in prevention and control initiatives.[26] With increased awareness and collaboration between the medical and allied health sectors, the effective prevention, control, and elimination targets of NTDs will be achieved.[17] Equipping pharmacist with adequate knowledge and skills will boost their confidence, increase their involvement in the prevention, and control of neglected tropical diseases and other public health programs.

Recommendation

Pharmacy students’ undergraduate programs ought to incorporate studies on mycetoma disease. Encouragement of students to participate in extracurricular pharmacy activities is key. For the students, it might be necessary to arrange symposiums and awareness campaigns where distinguished public health pharmacists will deliver lectures and talks.

Limitations of the study

This study was a cross-sectional study that obtained the information at a point in time. Hence, the possibility exists that the responses may differ if the study is conducted at a different time from the time of this study.

Second, findings from this study may not be a true representation of the students in other medical and health allied sciences.

Third, there is a possibility of self-report bias inherent in survey-based research and the non-random sampling approach.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacy students had good knowledge of mycetoma disease. They will want lectures/studies on mycetoma to be included in their undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. Therefore, policymakers and education regulatory organizations should incorporate studies on mycetoma, identification, diagnosis, management, prevention, and control strategies in the undergraduate pharmacy program curriculum through lectures, seminars, and debates. By embedding mycetoma studies into the pharmacy curriculum, you create a generation of pharmacists who are both technically competent and policy-aware. This raises disease visibility, expands the research base, strengthens advocacy, and makes it easier for policymakers to act – especially in areas like funding, essential medicines inclusion, and integration into primary health care.

Ethical approval:

The research/study approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of Nigeria Nsukka, number FPSRA/UNN/23/0068, dated 2023.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: None.

References

  1. , , , et al. Mycetoma caused by Madurella mycetomatis: A neglected infectious burden. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:566-574. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01131-4
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al. Mycetoma spatial geographical distribution in the Eastern Sennar locality, Sennar State, Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115:375-382. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab029
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Mycetoma: An epidemiology, etiology, clinical, laboratory and therapeutic review. An Bras Dermatol. 2018;93:8-18. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20187075
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , et al. Clinical features of mycetoma and the appropriate treatment options. Res Rep Trop Med. 2021;12:173-179.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , et al. Mycetoma: A unique neglected tropical disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):100-112. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00359-X
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , et al. Role of socioeconomic factors in developing mycetoma: Results from a household survey in Sennar State, Sudan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(10):e0010817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010817
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Mycetoma: The spectrum of clinical presentation. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018;3:97. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3030097
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Mycetoma: Reviewing a neglected disease. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019;44:123-129. doi: 10.1111/ced.13642
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , et al. Mycetoma in West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115:328-336. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab032
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. . Mycetoma: A thorn in the flesh. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:3-11. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(03)00009-9
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , et al. A new model for management of mycetoma in the Sudan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003271
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , et al. The mycetoma knowledge gap: Identification of research priorities. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002667
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , et al. Environmental occurrence of Madurella mycetomatis, the major agent of human eumycetoma in Sudan. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(3):1031-1036. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1031-1036.2002
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al. Modelling the spatial distribution of mycetoma in Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115:1144-1152. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab076
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , et al. A holistic approach to the mycetoma management. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006391
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Mycetoma laboratory diagnosis: Review article. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(8):e0005638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005638
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , et al. Knowledge and awareness of neglected tropical diseases and control strategies among healthcare students in five Asian countries: A cross-sectional study. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2024;27:101576.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , et al. Individual risk factors of mycetoma occurrence in Eastern sennar locality, sennar State, Sudan: A case-control study. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7:174. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080174
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , et al. Recognition and reporting of neglected tropical diseases by primary health care workers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:224.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . The epidemiology of mycetoma. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2012;6:320-326. doi: 10.1007/s12281-012-0102-1
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. . Mycetoma In: Current progress in medical mycology. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; . p. :355-80.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , et al. Interleukin-17 and matrix metalloprotease-9 expression in the mycetoma granuloma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007351
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Celebrating 20 years of collaboration to eliminate trachoma. Community Eye Health. 2024;37(124):17.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Longitudinal changes of deep and surface learning in a constructivist pharmacy curriculum. Pharmacy (Basel). 2020;8:200. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040200
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Long-term impact of sustained knowledge, confidence, and clinical application following a first-year student pharmacist diabetes self-care education program. Pharmacy (Basel). 2025;13:42. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13020042
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , et al. Knowledge and awareness of Neglected Tropical Diseases among senior medical students and intern doctors in Bangladesh. United States: Research Square 2023 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2576954/v1
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections